Skip to main content

Snake Eyes (2021) Review

Pointless Fun, At a Cost


SCORE: 59/100

Directed by: Robert Schwentke
Starring: Henry Golding, Andrew Koji, Haruka Abe, Takehiro Hira, Ursula Corbero, Samara Weaving

Synopsis: A G.I. Joe spin-off centered around the character of Snake Eyes.


****BEWARE SPOILERS AHEAD****


REVIEW:

I walked into Snake Eyes with no expectations. The trailer looked good, but the reviews were mixed. I can safely say that Snake Eyes is a fun yet flawed time, but is only really worth a trip to the movies if you're a fan of the G.I. Joe property.

Starting with some positives, this movie has great set design and beautiful costumes. The set at the ninja castle is gorgeous, combining modern aesthetics with the ancient Japanese style. The locations used in Tokyo are also gorgeous, injecting the film with color. The costume department must have had a lot of fun making the costumes for this film, because like the sets, they exude modern and ancient stylings. Unfortunately, we don't see much of Snake Eyes' actual outfit until the last five minutes or so, but it's incredibly faithful to the source material. 

Another positive for this movie is the casting. Henry Golding is great in this film, bringing a charismatic yet layered performance to the title role. Also great is Andrew Koji as Storm Shadow, who brings another layered and surprisingly deep performance to his character. The two work great off of each other, and had a great chemistry as allies, and enemies. If this film does end up creating a rebooted G.I. Joe cinematic universe, I can't wait to see where these two end up. The rest of the cast is good too, with other standouts being Haruka Abe as Akiko and Ursula Corbero as Baroness. 

It's because of these performances and the idea that this is set in the G.I. Joe world that makes it so much more fun than I expected. It takes a few steps in a fantastical direction regarding Snake Eyes' training, and the grounded nature of the rest of the film helps make it seem more plausible. Because of that the world seems more alive, and the threat Cobra poses and the existence of the Joes has more weight than I originally thought. 

As far as the rest of the story goes, it feels hit or miss. It flows nicely, and doesn't overstay its welcome, but it takes turns that I didn't necessarily enjoy. The main twist (if you want to call it that) is that Snake Eyes is initially working for the villains until he realizes that they are actually Cobra. It doesn't really work for me, and made the character of Snake Eyes a slight bit unlikeable, knowing full well that he intends to betray this new family in search of revenge. It felt like a cheap way to introduce conflict into the story. What I did like however, is how Storm Shadow is essentially a good guy until the very end, and how he was acting in the best interest of his clan.

This is where my positives start and the negatives begin. Snake Eyes feels like the kind of film that only got its director because so many others had passed on it. While I do feel that there is passion in front of the camera, and some behind the scenes, I feel that there's none from behind it. The directing here is inconsistent at best, with Robert Schwentke doing better during his dialogue sequences than during his action scenes. Which brings me to the largest problem here, the action.

The action in Snake Eyes, while fun, is filmed HORRIBLY. This film is guilty of overusing the Shaky Cam style of filming that has become the bane of action film fans' existence. While I can tell that there is massive talent on the fight and stunt team, it makes no difference since you can't tell what's going on. It's so unintelligible that most of the fight sequences, while well-choreographed, don't feel like they have any weight or power behind them. It's kind of the point in a film about ninjas to make the action the focal point, and it betrays the film here. It should've been handled by a better director or editor, perhaps Chad Stahelski or David Leitch?

My other biggest problem here is that the film is attempting to set up a larger world. With the inclusion of other characters like Scarlett and Baroness, they hint at larger things to come. However, due to the performance of Snake Eyes at the box office so far, I doubt this will come to fruition. It has the similar problem as the Snyder Cut of Justice League, where it feels like pointless set up for things that we won't be getting. I could always be wrong, and I enjoy being wrong, but this doesn't bode well for the future of the G.I. Joe franchise.

That's about it for Snake Eyes. Good performances, sets, and costumes make not the movie, as we can clearly see here. While I'm still glad to have seen it, It's not something that I would put into my film collection. I think it could've used a better director, cinematographer, and editor, which would've helped me to justify a rebooted G.I. Joe cinematic world. It's a harmless, fun movie that provides some fun story in the universe, but not much else. If you can put up with shaky cam, and are interested in the G.I. Joe property, than you might enjoy the film more than I did.

Conclusion: Snake Eyes is a fun film with great performances that is truly let down by horribly filmed action sequences and a lack of truly creative vision behind the camera. 

Score: 59/100


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spider-Man: No Way Home (2021) Review

Multiversal Mania SCORE: 86 /100 Directed by: Jon Watts Starring: Tom Holland, Zendaya, Benedict Cumberbatch, Alfred Molina, Willem Dafoe, Jamie Foxx, Marisa Tomei, Synopsis: With Spider-Man's identity now revealed, Peter asks Doctor Strange for help. When a spell goes wrong, dangerous foes from other worlds start to appear, forcing Peter to discover what it truly means to be Spider-Man. ****THERE WILL BE NO SPOILERS IN THIS REVIEW**** REVIEW: I will reiterate that I will not have ANY spoilers in this review, as to maintain the theater experience for all who may read this. No Way Home is the best Spider-Man film in the MCU, there's no doubt about it. It's darker, more emotional, and features some of the best performances from these characters yet. However, I do think it has a few glaring issues, most of which I can't discuss due to spoilers.  I'll start with my critiques I CAN discuss. The first act of this movie definitely feels rushed. It's almost like they wa...

Iowa by Slipknot (2001) Album Review

More but Less (WARNING) - The review for this album may include language or themes some may find distressing or disturbing.  Artist: Slipknot Album: Iowa Year: 2001 Band Lineup for Album: Sid Wilson - DJ/Samples, Joey Jordison - Drums, Paul Gray - Bass, Chris Fehn - Percussion, Jim Root - Guitar, Craig Jones - Samples, Shawn Crahan - Percussion, Mick Thomson - Guitar, Corey Taylor - Vocals Two years after the release of their debut album, it came time for Slipknot to release their follow-up album, Iowa. The pressure was on after the last album to continue their work, and the artists felt it. Tensions were high between members, drug and alcohol addictions, and other issues plagued the band. When the album released, it was hailed as the darkest and heaviest material yet. It contains the usual themes and topics from the first album, with messages and metaphors about the general hatred of other people, solipsism, disgust, anger, disaffection, psychosis, and rejection. I discovered this...

The Last Duel (2021) Review

The Truth at Last SCORE: 82 /100 Directed by: Ridley Scott Starring: Jodie Comer, Matt Damon, Adam Driver Synopsis: King Charles VI declares that Knight Jean de Carrouges settle his dispute with his squire by challenging him to a duel. ****BEWARE POTENTIAL SPOILERS AHEAD**** REVIEW: The Last Duel is a return to form for Ridley Scott. His previous historical films have been either good or horribly miscast, good being Gladiator and bad being Exodus: Gods and Kings. I'm happy to say that, while not perfect, The Last Duel is among his better historical films.  Ridley Scott has crafted a great-looking and relevant film that has an incredibly interesting structure. The film is told through three perspectives, Matt Damon's Jean, Adam Driver's Jacques, and Jodie Comer's Marguerite. All three stories vary in their accuracy, which accounts for a lot of the uncertainty the audience feels regarding the story. While some audience members may feel that this is repetitive, it's ac...